Axolotl Ratchet
Double Ratchet Algorithm
Status
Better documentation of this protocol is forthcoming. The below description is lacking details needed for a complete implementation. Also, an initial key agreement phase is given for example purposes, but this should not be considered part of the core algorithm.
Better documentation of this algorithm is forthcoming. The below description is lacking details needed for a complete implementation.
Goals
- Combine the forward-secrecy of symmetric-key updating with the "future-secrecy" of an OTR-like Diffie-Hellman ratchet.
- By "future-secrecy" we mean that a leak of keys to a passive eavesdropper will be healed by introducing new DH ratchet keys.
- Improve on OTR's future-secrecy with a "2-step" DH ratchet instead of "3-step".
- I.e. DH ratchet keys are used in a "send/receive" pattern, instead of "advertise/receive/send".
- Detect replay / reorder / deletion of messages.
- Allow decryption of out-of-order messages with minimal reduction in forward secrecy.
- Don't leak metadata in cleartext (such as identities or sequence numbers).
Algorithm
State
------
Each party stores the following values per conversation in persistent
storage:
RK : 32-byte root key which gets updated by DH ratchet
HKs, HKr : 32-byte header keys (send and recv versions)
NHKs, NHKr : 32-byte next header keys (")
CKs, CKr : 32-byte chain keys (used for forward-secrecy updating)
DHIs, DHIr : DH or ECDH Identity keys
DHRs, DHRr : DH or ECDH Ratchet keys
Ns, Nr : Message numbers (reset to 0 with each new ratchet)
PNs : Previous message numbers (# of msgs sent under prev ratchet)
ratchet_flag : True if the party will send a new ratchet key in next msg
skipped_HK_MK : A list of stored message keys and associated header keys
for "skipped" messages, i.e. messages that have not been
received despite the reception of more recent messages.
Entries may be stored with a timestamp, and deleted after
a certain age.
Initialization
Key Agreement
--------------
master_key : shared secret between Alice and Bob
B1 : Bob's initial DH ratchet key
- Parties exchange identity keys (A, B) and handshake keys (A0, A1) and (B0, B1)
- Parties assign "Alice" and "Bob" roles by comparing public keys
- Parties calculate master key using tripleDH:
- master_key = HASH( DH(A, B0) || DH(A0, B) || DH(A0, B0) )
Alice:
KDF from master_key: RK, HKs=<none>, HKr, NHKs, NHKr, CKs=<none>, CKr
DHIs, DHIr = A, B
DHRs, DHRr = <none>, B1
Ns, Nr = 0, 0
PNs = 0
ratchet_flag = True
Bob:
KDF from master_key: RK, HKr=<none>, HKs, NHKr, NHKs, CKr=<none>, CKs
DHIs, DHIr = B, A
DHRs, DHRr = B1, <none>
Ns, Nr = 0, 0
PNs = 0
ratchet_flag = False
Sending messages
-----------------
Local variables:
MK : message key
if ratchet_flag:
DHRs = generateECDH()
HKs = NHKs
RK, NHKs, CKs = KDF( HMAC-HASH(RK, DH(DHRs, DHRr)) )
PNs = Ns
Ns = 0
ratchet_flag = False
MK = HMAC-HASH(CKs, "0")
msg = Enc(HKs, Ns || PNs || DHRs) || Enc(MK, plaintext)
Ns = Ns + 1
CKs = HMAC-HASH(CKs, "1")
return msg
Receiving messages
-------------------
Local variables:
MK : message key
Np : Purported message number
PNp : Purported previous message number
CKp : Purported new chain key
DHp : Purported new DHr
RKp : Purported new root key
NHKp, HKp : Purported new header keys
Helper functions:
try_skipped_header_and_message_keys() : Attempt to decrypt the message
with skipped-over message keys (and their associated header keys) from
persistent storage.
stage_skipped_header_and_message_keys() : Given a current header key,
a current message number, a future message number, and a chain key,
calculates and stores all skipped-over message keys (if any) in a
staging area where they can later be committed, along with their
associated header key. Returns the chain key and message key
corresponding to the future message number. If passed a chain key
with value <none>, this function does nothing.
commit_skipped_header_and_message_keys() : Commits any skipped-over
message keys from the staging area to persistent storage (along
with their associated header keys).
if (plaintext = try_skipped_header_and_message_keys()):
return plaintext
if HKr != <none> and Dec(HKr, header):
Np = read()
CKp, MK = stage_skipped_header_and_message_keys(HKr, Nr, Np, CKr)
if not Dec(MK, ciphertext):
raise undecryptable
else:
if ratchet_flag or not Dec(NHKr, header):
raise undecryptable()
Np = read()
PNp = read()
DHRp = read()
stage_skipped_header_and_message_keys(HKr, Nr, PNp, CKr)
HKp = NHKr
RKp, NHKp, CKp = KDF( HMAC-HASH(RK, DH(DHRp, DHRs)) )
CKp, MK = stage_skipped_header_and_message_keys(HKp, 0, Np, CKp)
if not Dec(MK, ciphertext):
raise undecryptable()
RK = RKp
HKr = HKp
NHKr = NHKp
DHRr = DHRp
erase(DHRs)
ratchet_flag = True
commit_skipped_header_and_message_keys()
Nr = Np + 1
CKr = CKp
return read()
Variations
- Header encryption may be omitted if the underlying transport is already leaking metadata, and space is at a premium.
- In that case, the presence of a new ratchet key signals the recipient that the DH ratchet is advancing (instead of using encryption by the next header key as the signal).
- Instead of storing old header keys for skipped messages, old ratchet keys can be used to recognize delayed messages.
- Depending on how the key agreement is performed, it may be possible to omit the A1 and/or B1 keys.
- If a party knows she is the initiator (Alice) prior to sending her key agreement message, then she doesn't need to send the extra (A1) key, as it is unused.
- If Bob doesn't plan to send any messages prior to receiving Alice's first message, B1 can be omitted and both parties can set B1 equal to B0 with no loss of security.
- The chain keys could be updated on a time basis as well as a per-message basis.
- For example: If 24 hours elapse without receiving a message, you might wish to move to the next chain key in case there's an intercepted message you're unaware of.
IPR
The AxolotlDouble Ratchet specification (this wiki) is hereby placed in the public domain.
Feedback
Can be sent to axolotlgithub at trevp.net
Acknowledgements
Joint work with Moxie Marlinspike.
Thanks to Adam Langley for discussion and improving the receiving algorithm.
Thanks to Raphael Arias for requesting a text clarification.