Male Hegemony through Education: Construction of Gendered Identities

Authors

  • Hazir Ullah Lecturer Department of Sociology,
  • Johar - Ali Director Institute of Social Work, Sociology and Gender Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2012.11

Keywords:

Gender, hegemonic masculinity, social constructionism, discourse

Abstract

The fundamental presupposition of this paper is that ‘gender’ is a social category, hence a social construction, which can be negotiated and left fluid instead of something fixed and eternal. To examine the gendered social order, this study focuses on how hegemonic masculinity and feminine subordination are naturalized by positioning men as physically strong and women as weak on the ground of biological differences between the sexes. The study is informed by social constructionist understandings of gender. The main focus of the paper is to highlight how gendered discourses in Pakistan inform textbooks as objective and true knowledge. The data for the study comes from 28 educationists (11 females and 17 males). The study’s findings revealed that, despite prevailing claims to establishing gender equality and equity education, educationists are active in the production of gender/sexual identities and hierarchies in a ways that reinforces hegemonic ‘masculinity’ and a fixed notion of ‘femininity’. The paper concludes that what ends up as school knowledge arises from gendered power/knowledge relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Hazir Ullah, Lecturer Department of Sociology,
    Sociology Lecturer BPS 18
  • Johar - Ali, Director Institute of Social Work, Sociology and Gender Studies

    Professor of Sociology, Department of Gender Studies

     

    University of peshawra, Pakistan

References

Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.

de Beauvoir, S. (1972) The Second Sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Connell, RW. (1987) Gender and power. Cambridge: polity press.

Connell, RW. (2006) ‘Understanding men: Gender Sociology and the New International Research on Masculinities’. In Skelton. C, Francis. B and Smulyan. L. Gender and Education. London: Sage Publication.

Davies, B. (1989) Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales. London: Allen and Unwin.

Davies, B. and Harre, R. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves’, Journal of Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 1, 43-63.

Fausto-Sterling (2000 b) Sexing the Body. New York: Basic Books.

Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writing, 1972-1977. Gordon, C (ed), Gordon, C et al. (trans). New York: Pantheon.

Francis, B. (2000) Boys, girls and achievement. London: Routledge.

Francis, Becky (2006) The nature of gender. In Skelton. C, Francis. B and Smulyan. L. Gender and Education. London: Sage Publication.

Gorman, C. (1992) ‘Sizing up the Sexes’. Time, January 20: 42–51.

Glaser, B.G., and Stress, A. L (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategy for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

Haslanger, S. (1995) ‘Ontology and Social Construction’, Philosophical Topics, 23: 95–125.

Levine, E. and Hole, J. (1973) Rebirth of Feminism. New York: TBS The Book Service Ltd.

Lumpkin, A. (1984). Historical perspectives of female participation in youth sport. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Anaheim, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 243 878).

MacInnes, J. (1998) The end of Masculinity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Mikkola, Mari (2011) ‘Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) retrieved on June 5, 2012 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/feminism-gender/.

Millett, K. (1971) Sexual Politics. London: Granada Publishing Ltd.

Paechter, C. (2001). Power, Gender and Curriculum. In Paechter, C., Preedy, M., Scott, D. and Soler, J. (Edited) Knowledge, Power and Learning. London: Open University Press.

Paechter, C. (2007) Discourse of Masculinity and Femininity: implication for equality and difference. In Reiss, M., DePalam, R., and Ttkinson, E. (ed) Marginality and Difference in Education and Beyond, Sterling: Trentham Book.

Rose, S. (2001) ‘Escaping evolutionary psychology’. In Rose H and Rose S (eds) Alas Poor Darwin: argument against evolutionary psychology. London: Vintage.

Skelton, C. (1997) ‘Revisiting gender issue in reading schemes’. Education, 3-13, 25: 1, 37-43.

Sharpe, Sue (1976) Just Like A Girl, How girls learn to be women, London: Penguin.

Skelton. C, Francis. B and Smulyan. L. (2006) Gender and Education. London: Sage Publication.

Skeggs, Beverley (2002) Formations of Class and Gender, London: Sage Publication.

Stanworth, M. (1981) Gender and Schooling. London: Hutchinson.

Ullah, H. 2006. Engendering Human Bodies through Different Forms of Knowledge in Contemporary NWFP. M. Phil. Diss, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.

Ullah, H. and Skelton, C. (2012) Gender representation in the public sector schools textbooks of Pakistan, Educational Studies, 4 (3) 1-12

Walkerdine, V. (1990) School Girls Fictions. London: Verso.

Walkerdine, V. and Ringrose, J. (2006) ‘Femininities: Reclassifying Upward Mobility and the Neo-liberal Subject’. In Skelton. C, Francis. B and Smulyan. L. Gender and Education. London: Sage Publication.

Whitehead, V, Lucy, H. and Melody. J (2001) Growing up girls: psychological explorations of gender and class. London: Palgrave

Downloads

Published

2012-10-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ullah, H., & Ali, J. .-. (2012). Male Hegemony through Education: Construction of Gendered Identities. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 1(3), 215-242. https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2012.11