利用etree、xpath与findall一样都可以检索文本内容。速度似乎没大的区别
import requests
from lxml import etree
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
import re
import pandas as pd
hh=0
global jj,ress,jjjj
jjjj=pd.DataFrame()
def getHTMLtext(url):
kv={'cookie':'bocms_visite_user_session=277AC1F5614BA3CA446EC409A84B55B0; __jsluid_h=5dba586b6de5a1b8c4781be2edf14691; JSESSIONID=850880BAC7029E42C6C88519BDE935AC; Hm_lvt_151cd78565747a0f35795a382380cbde=1629458498,1631354073; DWRSESSIONID=xZ7JufPhg!AltUSlFR~8l6mKCH1wQfQikLn; Hm_lpvt_151cd78565747a0f35795a382380cbde=1631354401',
'user-agent':'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.114 Safari/537.36'}
try:
r=requests.get(url,headers=kv,timeout=30)
r.raise_for_status()
本文探讨了在Python爬虫中,使用etree库的xpath方法和findall方法检索文本内容的效率和效果。实验表明,两者在速度上差异不大,都能实现相同的结果。
订阅专栏 解锁全文

1万+

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



